As mentioned in the earlier post, the Rudland 914i wind generator when stowed for cruising is swung down about its base pivot with the head resting forward and facing down with the nose piece positioned in a soft ring. This means that the tail or rudder is pointing upwards and becomes the highest part of the boat.
The "fan" stowed in the reverse position
For the more modern canals (mostly the double lock canals) the listed air draft is high enough, for the most part, for this not to be a problem. The narrow canals are a different case altogether, and have to be assumed without adequate headroom throughout. To overcome this restriction, the base pivot was so positioned so as to allow the head to be swung backwards with the tail now located in the rear hatch with the pole supported in a 'U' block, the blades resting on the open hatch cover. This worked well, but required all stays to be disconnected and was just a bit of a pain to be honest, especially if it was required in an "emergency". Furthermore if it rained, some protection was needed for the open hatch. So human character being as it is the "fan" (as we call it) was left in the forward position if we thought we could get away with it, but keeping a wary eye open assessing each bridge as we came near. The Macclesfield Canal proved the error of this practice. The beautiful stone bridges gave adequate clearance to start with, and as they were of an apparent standard construction we felt confident that they would not be a problem... until at Macclesfield there was one that had been shotcreted underneath and the fin was, lets say, 1mm too high. Very difficult to judge. Well the generator is very sturdily made and resisted. In the event it appeared that only the fin and its attachment got bent and repairs were easily made. Clearly another solution was required.
The rudder fin modification showing the fan in the forward stowed position.
The solution was simple in fact. Just one attachment bolt was removed from the fin and supporting bar permitting the fin to fall forwards when the fan was stowed forwards, and by replacing the bolt in the fin only, it fell back into proper position when in use. This has proved successful to the point that we just made it under the railway bridge at Stoke on Trent. This is a seriously low bridge and there are few worse. There are lower bridges around and there could conceivably be some which would require the entire assembly to be removed, however they are well placarded.
After two year's experience with the generator you must ask, was it worth it. Has the product lived up to expectations. The answer is yes and no. Yes it has done what was expected of it, namely to provide a trickle of current to bring the batteries up to full charge (when the wind blows of course). The batteries have been in much better condition since they were changed last year, rarely falling below 70% charge each morning according to the "Smartgauge". On the other hand, "No" because the refrigerator is always trying to discharge the batteries and they never have a chance to get fully charged, so in a way the original design brief was flawed. The best solution will come in the future when new battery technology improves the problem we have with the lead acid batteries, namely degradation due to partial charge and discharge, and the lifetime limit of cycles. Perhaps we are not far off with Lithium Ion, but it is just too expensive for now. This product is ideally suited to maintaining battery voltage when no demands are being made, on moorings for example. It has proved well able to survive some of the stormy conditions experienced in the winter of 2013/14.